Site • RSS • Apple PodcastsDescription (podcaster-provided):
Cracking tales of historical mathematics and its interplay with science, philosophy, and culture. Revisionist history galore. Contrarian takes on received wisdom. Implications for teaching. Informed by current scholarship. By Dr Viktor Blåsjö.Themes and summary (AI-generated based on podcaster-provided show and episode descriptions):
➤ Revisionist history of mathematics and science • Greek geometry (Euclid, proofs, constructions, diagrams) • Philosophy of geometry (Kant, rationalism/empiricism, innate space, non-Euclidean) • Astronomy/heliocentrism debates • Reassessing Galileo, Archimedes, Copernicus, Torricelli • Cultural and teaching implicationsThis podcast explores the history of mathematics through a deliberately revisionist and often contrarian lens, treating mathematical ideas as products of particular intellectual cultures rather than as a straightforward march of progress. Across its episodes, it revisits famous stories, canonical results, and standard “origin myths” in order to ask what the sources actually support, how later narratives were constructed, and what has been overlooked by popular retellings.
A major throughline is ancient Greek mathematics, especially Euclidean geometry and Archimedean science. The show digs into how proofs, definitions, axioms, constructions, and diagrams functioned in practice, including the extent to which geometric reasoning depended on physical drawing, embodied actions, and oral pedagogy. It also considers how foundational concepts like straightness, point, and postulate invite philosophical interpretation, and how differing views of what counts as a good axiom connect to broader debates about justification, rigor, and the possibility of reducing mathematics to logic.
The podcast frequently links mathematical developments to philosophy and epistemology, comparing rationalist and empiricist conceptions of knowledge and examining how figures such as Kant and Poincaré framed geometry’s relationship to human perception and to physical space. The emergence of non-Euclidean geometry appears as a turning point that reshaped what geometry was understood to be, moving it toward formal alternatives and away from direct identification with the structure of the world.
Another recurring theme is historiography: how reputations are made, how credit is assigned, and how “received wisdom” can harden into simplified morality tales. This includes critical re-examinations of celebrated scientific figures and of the idea that key breakthroughs were singular, unprecedented events, as well as discussions of knowledge transmission across cultures, particularly in astronomy around Copernicus and medieval Islamic models. Throughout, the show foregrounds interpretive disputes, source limitations, and implications for how mathematics might be taught and understood today.
