Site • RSS • Apple PodcastsDescription (podcaster-provided):
a philosophy podcast about neurodivergenceThemes and summary (AI-generated based on podcaster-provided show and episode descriptions):
➤ Autism “theory of mind” mind-myths • critique of autism research methods, replication, pseudoscience • neurodiversity vs pathology paradigms, values in science • empathy in autism, psychometrics, alexithymia, interoception • empathy, morality, deliberate practiceThis podcast uses philosophy and philosophy of science to examine neurodivergence, with a sustained focus on autism and how autism research shapes public understanding. Across the season, the hosts scrutinize the influential idea that autism involves a “theory of mind” deficit—tracing how this claim emerged, how it has been measured (especially through false-belief tasks), and why it has remained culturally and scientifically durable even amid replication problems and shifting definitions. Conversations highlight methodological concerns in psychology (such as small samples, poorly characterized participant groups, and concept drift) alongside the role of background assumptions and social incentives in keeping certain narratives alive.
A recurring theme is how scientific concepts and measurement tools can carry moral stakes: descriptions of autistic cognition are shown to affect everyday interactions, institutional practices, and attitudes about competence and humanity. The podcast explores when contested research becomes “bad science” or pseudoscience, drawing on figures like Popper and Lakatos to frame debates about falsifiability, progressive versus degenerating research programs, and responsible evidential standards.
The show also introduces alternative ways of understanding autistic social and perspectival differences without deficit framing, including the double empathy problem, monotropism, and interoception-focused accounts, linking these to the broader contrast between pathology and neurodiversity paradigms.
Later discussions connect these issues to empathy: how empathy is defined and tested, why common myths about autistic empathy persist, and how empathy might be better understood as a multi-step, learnable set of skills tied to moral life and interpersonal negotiation. Throughout, the podcast integrates interviews with autistic researchers and philosophers, emphasizing lived experience alongside conceptual analysis.
| Episodes: |
Episode 7: "Deliberative Empathy"2025-Aug-07 44 minutes |
Episode 6: "I choose to live life deliberately"2025-Aug-04 34 minutes |
Episode 5: "New Paradigms, New Values"2023-Dec-11 43 minutes |
Episode 4: "Zombie Pseudoscience"2023-Dec-04 41 minutes |
Episode 3: "Violins and Violas"2023-Nov-27 35 minutes |
Episode 2: "An Intellectualist Fossil"2023-Nov-20 30 minutes |
Episode 1: "A Productive Irritant"2023-Nov-13 24 minutes |
Welcome to NeuroDiving (Trailer)2023-Nov-03 3 minutes |